These images are then imported into a photo-editor and blended/merged together. one image that focuses on the foreground and another that focuses on the background. We’ll come back to the exact step-by-step guide to focus stacking in a bit but the main idea of the technique is to capture two or more images with different focal points i.e. While there are photographers who use it for portrait and wildlife photography too, it’s less common (and a lot more difficult) to use when photographing moving subjects.
Helicon focus price software#
The technique requires the use of both a camera and a post-processing software such as Adobe Photoshop or Helicon Focus.įocus stacking is used within many genres of photography but it’s perhaps most commonly used in landscape and macro photography. Focus Stacking was essential to get a sharp image due to the wide-angle lens and distance between immidiate foreground and background. Simply put, focus stacking is an intermediate technique that makes it possible to create image that are sharp from the very front and all the way to the back, no matter the distance between the closest foreground and background. Let’s take a closer look at what focus stacking for sharper images is and how you can quickly learn and implement this technique in your own workflow.
It’s used by photographers of all levels and, with a little basic understanding of photography and post-processing, it’s not as difficult as one may think. Zerene gives the best final image by a large margin and the in camera stacking is noticeably better than Olympus Workspace.Focus stacking is a go-to technique for landscape photographers to achieve images that are razor-sharp from front to back. I have compared Zerene with Olympus Workspace and Olympus in camera stacking, by stacking the same bracketed images with all 3. Try them both to find out which interface you like the best and to decide if their output is worth the purchase price.
Helicon focus price free#
You can try both programmes for free, as each offer a free 30 day trial. The personal edition of Zerene is currently $89USD for a lifetime licence and the lite version of Helicon is $115USD. The advantage of the Helicon approach is a simpler workflow.īoth programmes come in personal, enthusiast, and commercial variants with Zerene currently slightly cheaper in each version. The advantage of the Zerene approach is that it leaves raw conversion algorithms (and their updating) to the specialists. Zerene's philosophy is to let the user use an external raw editor (Lightroom, Capture One, etc.) to convert raw files to 16bit TIFF files which are then imported into Zerene to be stacked.
One of the major differences in workflows is the way they handle raw files. Helicon has a more user friendly interface. The end results from either programme will be indistinguishable but their interfaces and workflow are different. Both do a very good job of stacking and offer the ability to edit the stacked images to correct any small stacking errors. There are two major specialist stacking programs, Zerene Stacker and Helicon Focus.
0 kommentar(er)
